refactor(katana): rename starknet config to execution config #2557
Conversation
WalkthroughOhayo, sensei! This pull request introduces significant changes to the configuration management within the Katana project. It consolidates the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
crates/katana/node/src/config/execution.rs (2)
1-4: Ohayo, sensei! Constants look good, but could use some documentation.The constants are well-defined and their names are self-explanatory. However, adding documentation comments would enhance clarity for other developers.
Consider adding doc comments to explain the purpose and any constraints for each constant. For example:
/// Maximum depth of recursion allowed in the execution. pub const MAX_RECURSION_DEPTH: usize = 1000; /// Default maximum number of steps allowed for invocation. pub const DEFAULT_INVOCATION_MAX_STEPS: u32 = 10_000_000; /// Default maximum number of steps allowed for validation. pub const DEFAULT_VALIDATION_MAX_STEPS: u32 = 1_000_000;
6-11: Ohayo again, sensei! ExecutionConfig struct looks solid!The
ExecutionConfigstruct is well-designed, encapsulating all necessary execution parameters. The public fields allow for easy access and modification, which is appropriate for a configuration struct.Consider adding more derived traits to enhance the struct's functionality:
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)] pub struct ExecutionConfig { // ... existing fields ... }Adding
PartialEqandEqwould allow for easy comparison between differentExecutionConfiginstances, which could be useful in testing or configuration management scenarios.crates/dojo-test-utils/src/sequencer.rs (3)
10-10: Ohayo, sensei! Consider using more specific imports.The wildcard import
pub use katana_node::config::*;brings in all public items from theconfigmodule. While this simplifies import management, it may reduce code clarity and potentially introduce naming conflicts.Consider explicitly importing only the necessary items from
katana_node::configto improve code readability and maintainability. For example:use katana_node::config::{Config, SequencingConfig, /* other specific items */};This approach makes it clearer which items are being used from the
configmodule.
Line range hint
36-54: Ohayo, sensei! The changes look good, but let's add some documentation.The modification to accept a
Configparameter in thestartmethod improves flexibility in configuring the test sequencer. This change aligns well with the broader refactoring of the configuration structure.Consider adding or updating the method documentation to reflect this change. For example:
/// Starts a new TestSequencer with the given configuration. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `config` - The configuration to use for the sequencer. /// /// # Returns /// /// A new `TestSequencer` instance. pub async fn start(config: Config) -> Self { // ... existing implementation ... }This documentation will help other developers understand how to use the updated method.
Line range hint
114-131: Ohayo, sensei! The changes look great, but let's make it even clearer.The modification to accept a
SequencingConfigparameter in theget_default_test_configfunction enhances flexibility in configuring the sequencing behavior while maintaining default values for other configurations. This change aligns well with the broader refactoring of the configuration structure.To improve clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this function and the significance of the
SequencingConfigparameter. For example:/// Returns a default test configuration with custom sequencing settings. /// /// This function allows specifying custom sequencing configuration while using /// default values for other configuration aspects such as dev settings, chain /// specification, and RPC configuration. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `sequencing` - Custom sequencing configuration to be used in the test setup. pub fn get_default_test_config(sequencing: SequencingConfig) -> Config { // ... existing implementation ... }This additional documentation will help other developers understand the purpose and usage of this function more easily.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- bin/katana/src/cli/node.rs (6 hunks)
- crates/dojo-test-utils/src/sequencer.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/katana/core/src/backend/config.rs (0 hunks)
- crates/katana/core/src/backend/mod.rs (0 hunks)
- crates/katana/core/src/constants.rs (0 hunks)
- crates/katana/node/src/config/dev.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/katana/node/src/config/execution.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/katana/node/src/config/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/katana/node/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- crates/katana/core/src/backend/config.rs
- crates/katana/core/src/backend/mod.rs
- crates/katana/core/src/constants.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (15)
crates/katana/node/src/config/execution.rs (1)
13-21: Domo, sensei! Default implementation is on point!The
Defaulttrait implementation forExecutionConfigis well-done. It correctly uses the constants defined earlier to set default values, allowing for easy creation of a defaultExecutionConfiginstance.This implementation will be particularly useful when creating new configurations or when you need a base configuration to modify. Good job!
crates/katana/node/src/config/dev.rs (3)
2-2: Ohayo, sensei! LGTM on the struct definition changes.The removal of
#[derive(Default)]from theDevConfigstruct is a good move. It allows for more precise control over the default values of the struct fields, which is consistent with the manual implementation ofDefaultadded later in the file.
25-29: Ohayo again, sensei! The manualDefaultimplementation looks great!The explicit implementation of the
Defaulttrait forDevConfigis a solid choice. Setting bothfeeandaccount_validationtotrueby default ensures that fee charging and account validation are enabled in the development configuration. This approach provides more flexibility for future modifications if needed.
Line range hint
2-29: Ohayo once more, sensei! Let's verify the impact of these changes.While the default behavior of
DevConfigremains unchanged, it's crucial to ensure that no existing code relies directly on the#[derive(Default)]attribute. These changes improve code maintainability and readability by making the default values explicit.To confirm that these changes don't introduce any issues, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure they still work as expected with the new manual
Defaultimplementation.✅ Verification successful
Ohayo once more, sensei! Since the previous search didn't find any direct usages of
DevConfig::default(), let's dive a bit deeper to ensure everything's in order. Please run the following script:This will help verify that there are no hidden usages or implicit dependencies on the
Defaulttrait forDevConfig.
Ohayo once more, sensei! Since the previous script encountered an error, let's adjust our approach to ensure we capture all necessary instances. Please run the following scripts:
If the first command returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure that
#[derive(Default)]is no longer used forDevConfig. The second command should ideally return no results, confirming that allDevConfiginstances explicitly set their fields.
Ohayo once more, sensei! Great news – the
DevConfigstruct doesn't use the derivedDefaulttrait, and there are no direct calls toDevConfig::default(). With all instantiations explicitly setting fields, your changes maintain the default behavior without introducing any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any direct usage of Default::default() on DevConfig # Test: Search for direct usage of Default::default() on DevConfig rg --type rust "DevConfig::default\(\)" cratesLength of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any instantiation of DevConfig without explicit field values # Using ast-grep to find instances where DevConfig is instantiated without setting fields ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'DevConfig { $$$ }' crates # Additionally, check for any #[derive(Default)] implementations on DevConfig ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'#[derive(Default)]\nstruct DevConfig { $$$ }' cratesLength of output: 721
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure `DevConfig` does not use the derived Default trait and all instantiations set fields explicitly # 1. Check for any #[derive(Default)] on DevConfig rg --type rust '#\[derive\s*\(.*Default.*\)\]\s*pub\s+struct\s+DevConfig' crates # 2. Confirm all `DevConfig` instantiations explicitly set fields rg --type rust 'DevConfig\s*::\s*default\s*\(\)' cratesLength of output: 140
crates/katana/node/src/config/mod.rs (3)
Line range hint
1-58: Ohayo once more, sensei! Overall changes look great.The refactoring from
StarknetConfigtoExecutionConfigand the introduction of theexecutionmodule align well with the PR objectives. These changes suggest a move towards a more generic and potentially extensible execution configuration system.A few points to consider:
- Ensure that all parts of the codebase that previously used
StarknetConfighave been updated to useExecutionConfig.- Update any documentation or comments that might reference the old configuration structure.
- Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind this refactoring, which could be helpful for future maintainers.
Great work on this refactoring, sensei! It should improve the flexibility and maintainability of the configuration system.
37-38: Ohayo again, sensei! Field update in Config struct looks solid.The replacement of
starknet: StarknetConfigwithexecution: ExecutionConfigis consistent with the refactoring objectives. This change suggests a more generic and potentially extensible approach to execution configuration.To ensure a smooth transition, let's verify that all usages of the old
starknetfield have been updated throughout the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all usages of the old 'starknet' field have been updated # Test: Search for any remaining references to 'config.starknet' or 'Config::starknet' rg --type rust -e 'config\.starknet' -e 'Config::starknet'If this search returns any results, please update those occurrences to use
config.executionorConfig::executionas appropriate.
3-3: Ohayo, sensei! New module import looks good.The addition of the
executionmodule and the import ofExecutionConfigalign well with the refactoring objectives. This change improves the organization of the configuration structure.To ensure completeness, let's verify the contents of the new
executionmodule:Also applies to: 10-10
✅ Verification successful
Ohayo, sensei! It looks like there was a typo in the previous script. Let's try running the corrected script to verify the
ExecutionConfigstruct:
Ohayo, sensei! Let's search the entire codebase to locate the
ExecutionConfigstruct:
Ohayo, sensei! The
ExecutionConfigstruct is correctly defined in theexecutionmodule. Everything looks good with the recent changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the new execution module # Test: Check if the ExecutionConfig is defined in the execution module ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'struct ExecutionConfig { $$$' crates/katana/node/src/config/execution.rsLength of output: 340
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the new execution module # Test: Check if the ExecutionConfig is defined in the execution module ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'struct ExecutionConfig { $$$' crates/katana/node/src/config/execution.rsLength of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the ExecutionConfig struct across the codebase rg --type rust 'struct ExecutionConfig' .Length of output: 117
crates/katana/node/src/lib.rs (1)
167-169: Ohayo, sensei! LGTM: Execution config refactor looks great!The changes align perfectly with the PR objective of renaming the starknet config to execution config. The
CfgEnvinitialization now usesconfig.executioninstead ofconfig.starknet, which improves clarity and consistency throughout the codebase. The functionality remains unchanged, ensuring a smooth transition.bin/katana/src/cli/node.rs (7)
28-30: Ohayo, sensei! Importing execution configuration constants.The addition of
ExecutionConfig,DEFAULT_INVOCATION_MAX_STEPS, andDEFAULT_VALIDATION_MAX_STEPSto the imports is appropriate and sets up the execution configuration correctly.
192-192: Ohayo, sensei! Updating default forvalidate_max_steps.Changing the default value to
DEFAULT_VALIDATION_MAX_STEPSensures consistency with the new execution configuration.
197-197: Ohayo, sensei! Updating default forinvoke_max_steps.Updating the default value to
DEFAULT_INVOCATION_MAX_STEPSaligns with the new configuration structure.
287-291: Ohayo, sensei! Incorporatingexecutioninto the node configuration.Adding
executionto theConfigstruct ensures that execution parameters are properly included in the node's configuration.
351-356: Ohayo, sensei! Implementing theexecution_configmethod.The new
execution_configmethod correctly constructs anExecutionConfigwith the appropriateinvocation_max_stepsandvalidation_max_stepsvalues.
500-501: Ohayo, sensei! Updating tests for default execution parameters.The test cases accurately verify the default values for
invocation_max_stepsandvalidation_max_stepsin the execution configuration.
532-533: Ohayo, sensei! Updating tests for custom execution parameters.The test cases correctly validate custom values for
invocation_max_stepsandvalidation_max_steps, ensuring that the configuration accepts and applies user-provided values.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2557 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.79% 69.45% -0.35%
==========================================
Files 396 397 +1
Lines 51160 51222 +62
==========================================
- Hits 35709 35577 -132
- Misses 15451 15645 +194 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation